| Practices Embrace Tablet PCs
By John McCormack
John McCormack is a writer for Physicians
Practice
Despite the clinical and
cost advantages that computers can bring to medicine, many physicians
are loath to give up their tools of choice: clipboard, paper and
pen.
Why? Computers, in a word, are clumsy. It’s difficult for
physicians to use a full size or even laptop computer while sprinting
from exam room to exam room, patient to patient. On the other hand,
personal digital assistants, while offering much needed mobility,
simply don’t meet physicians’ needs (see sidebar).
Enter the Tablet PC. These devices, about the same size as a clipboard,
offer wireless access to data whenever and wherever it is needed.
Running on standard operating systems, Tablet PCs enable users to
take notes using natural handwriting with a stylus or digital pen
on a touch screen.
Although Tablet PCs were introduced to the market with a great deal
of hoopla about a year ago, the question still remains: Will these
devices provide the silver bullet necessary to get physicians to
embrace computers? Many early adopters sing the praises of Tablet
PCs. Others, however, say that the devices still don’t measure
up to pen and paper.
Looking
good
Certainly, the Tablet PC appears to offer everything a physician
could want, according to Bill Crounse, M.D., global health care
industry manager for the Healthcare and Life Sciences Industry Solution
Group at Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Wash.
“Although the Tablet PC is being used with customer applications
by different industries around the world, it seems especially perfect
for medicine because its design mimics the patient chart physicians
have been jotting their notes in for years,” Crounse said.
Tablet PCs are available in two formats, a convertible model with
an integrated keyboard and display that rotates 180 degrees and
can be folded down over the keyboard — or a slate style, with
a removable keyboard. The user’s handwritten notes, which
can be edited and revised, can also be indexed and searched or shared
via e-mail or cell phone.
Tablet PCs offer substantial computing power. Many come with the
Microsoft Windows XP Tablet PC Edition operating system, which can
translate handwritten notes to text instantly or save handwritten
notes as digital ink files. Tablet PCs also can include voice recognition
software.
Catching on
Certainly, many doctors are adopting Tablet PCs because they offer
the features needed to use computers at the point of care.
Carlton Hays, M.D., for example, decided that Tablet PCs are the
answer to a long-standing computer usage problem at the Jackson
Clinic in Memphis, Tenn. Before adopting Tablet PCs about a year
ago, the 132-physician practice had virtually ignored its electronic
medical records system.
“For a couple of years, we maintained both electronic records
and paper charts,” said Hays, who in addition to maintaining
a full patient load acts as the medical informatics advisor for
the practice. “One of the obstacles to getting rid of the
paper chart, though, was providing doctors with a way to view the
record. We needed a device that would be easy for doctors to use
at the point of care.”
In the initial effort to get doctors to use the Physicians Workstation
EMR from Wang Healthcare in North Billerica, Mass., Hays installed
PCs in all of the exam rooms. But the doctors found the PCs to be
much too cumbersome.
With a PC sitting in the corner of the exam room, the physician
would come into the room, log on to the computer and then look up
a patient’s record. The physician would do all of this while
the patient waited for the exam to start.
“We would have to pull up the last note to find out what was
going on with the patient and to learn a little more about who the
patient is,” Hays recalled. “It was very awkward because
the patient would be sitting there, and we really wouldn’t
know much about them. We couldn’t start a conversation.”
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
regulations also prompted security concerns. If the PCs were left
on, patients could potentially view private information on the screens.
But shutting down the computers after each use would mean that the
doctors would have to spend an inordinate amount of time logging
on and off of the system each day.
The Tablet PC seemed like a viable option. After testing a number
of Tablets from various vendors, Hays chose a slate-shaped Tablet
PC from Motion Computing in Austin, Texas. The Tablet’s bright
12.1-inch screen allows doctors to view a full-page document without
scrolling. Its 3-pound slate design, which is about the size of
a clipboard, is easy to carry in one arm and enables doctors to
work as they do with a pen to access patient records and enter notes.
Because the practice’s physicians continue to dictate notes,
Hays chose not to add an integrated keyboard, which adds extra weight
and a cumbersome swivel mechanism.
Working with the Tablets makes life much easier for the doctors,
Hays said.
“Although we have not yet quantified efficiency, the doctors
spend a lot less time looking for things that they need,”
he said. “Before if we were trying to find an immunization
record, we would spend an inordinate amount of time flipping through
paper trying to find the immunization stamp. Now, we just click
on a tab and the immunization record appears.”
Providing hardware options
Jeffrey Hurless, D.P.M., also wanted to implement an electronic
medical records
system in his Thousand Oaks, Calif.-based practice. He knew, however,
that he wanted a system that could be used with multiple types of
hardware to accommodate the various needs of his staff. Hurless
settled on the Patient Chart Manager from Prime Clinical Systems,
Pasadena, Calif. — an electronic medical records system that
is built to work with numerous types of hardware.
A number of PCs around the office enable staff members to access
the system, but Hurless did not want to use PCs in the exam room
because he thought they would have a negative impact on patient-doctor
interaction.
“I really wanted to reap the benefits of using an EMR but
I didn’t want to significantly change how I interact with
patients. Essentially, I wanted to conduct patient visits in the
same manner that I had conducted them when I was using a paper chart,”
he said.
As such, Hurless eventually decided to use a Stylistic 4300 Tablet
PC from Santa Clara, Calif.-based Fujitsu.
“I simply carry the Tablet under my arm, just as I would carry
paper charts, and then use the pen stylus to unobtrusively write
notes, while maintaining eye contact with my patients. I wanted
to continue to look patients in the eyes and talk. To me, that is
what the patient-doctor relationship is all about,” he said.
Having the completed medical record right at his fingertips enables
Hurless to quickly assess each patient’s clinical situation
— making it possible to offer better service to patients.
Waiting for the next iteration
Although early adopters are singing the praises of Tablet PCs, widespread
adoption might not be in the cards yet, said Gregg Malkary, managing
director of Spyglass Consulting Group, a market intelligence firm
based in Menlo Park, CA.
“I have interviewed hundreds of doctors — and many are
still reluctant to use a Tablet PC,” Malkary said. He says
doctors are shying away from the devices for the following reasons:
- Cost. Tablet PCs cost about $2,000, whereas
PCs can be purchased for less than half of that amount.
- Weight. Tablet PCs weigh about 3 or 4 pounds.
“Doctors would be comfortable with a 1- to 2-pound device
— but 3 or 4 pounds is too much,” he said.
- Size. Physicians find the Tablets to be too
big. They want something that will fit into a lab coat.
- Durability. The Tablets are too fragile for
physician use. Doctors work in a fast-paced environment. So, they
are likely to drop the Tablets. “They don’t want to
spend $800 [for repairs] every time they accidentally drop the
device,” Malkary said.
- Battery life. The average battery life for
a Tablet is only about three hours. Physicians want a device that
will carry them through the entire day.
Tablet PCs, however, could catch on in the future
— if the form changes, Malkary predicted.
Vendors are already trying to accommodate the health care industry’s
needs. For example, Motion has added a light sensor so that the
batteries only use the minimal amount of power needed, based on
the light — increasing battery life in some instances.
“The hardware is heading in the right direction,” Malkary
said. “If the manufacturers can come up with a Tablet that
is 1.5 to 2 pounds and has a battery life of eight hours or more
— and only costs about $1,000, then I think there will be
more widespread adoption.”
For more practice management resources and tools,
visit www.yourpractice-online.com.
Questioning
the Future of
PDAs in Health Care
Will personal digital assistants (PDAs) go the way of the
beta VCR? Only time will tell, but with the arrival of Tablet
PCs, PDAs appear to be losing momentum in health care.
Although PDAs offer physicians much needed mobility and affordability,
the devices are falling short in other areas, said Tom Bernard,
director of strategic product planning, Fujitsu.
PDAs simply don’t quite meet the needs of physicians
because the devices:
- Don’t run on the same operating
systems as PCs, making it difficult to run the same programs
- Don’t offer enough screen
space for physicians to adequately view data and images
- Don’t provide enough processing
power to run complicated applications
“They offer the great benefit
of being lightweight and easy to carry around,” Bernard
said, “but they are too difficult to use for health
care applications.” |
Back to top
|